31 years of CIDM — explore it as a living scientific institution
You do not need to learn the whole iSydney architecture first. Start with a paper, pathogen, technology, person, period or question and follow the relationships.
What can I do here?
Try these first
Important beta boundary
What we want colleagues to notice
Is something missing? Is a relationship wrong? Is terminology outdated? Does a historical capability have another name? Is there an old dataset or question worth revisiting? Those corrections are not merely website feedback—they are part of iCIDM's Reality Return.
Publication Package Bridge: follow the current 1,947 unique-work master and its versioned provenance; legacy 2,231 discovery-derived analyses remain historical branches.
The core CIDM tools are back in one package
The 31-year corpus can now be explored at several scales
Core colleague route recovered
21 colleague-facing pages were checked. Current internal-link audit found 13 remaining broken-link occurrences within this beta-facing set.
P1 has started: key pages now carry a common boundary explaining that observed ≠ candidate ≠ reviewed ≠ validated.
Every important statement now has a reading rule
Before colleagues interpret a graph, journey, gap or future direction, the site distinguishes corpus observation from candidate interpretation, human review, validation and proposal.
Public claims are becoming auditable objects
The first pass extracted 338 candidate quantitative/state-bearing statements. They now have IDs, page provenance, boundary fields and review status.
Release-critical statements now have evidence bindings
The first 30 high-impact claims have been separated from the larger review queue and assigned explicit evidence/boundary/release states.
The legacy 2,231-record discovery branch is auditing itself
Structural checks are strong, while taxonomy checks have surfaced historical classification flags that should be reviewed before headline interpretation.
Two real taxonomy problems are now reviewable experiments
Early-WGS and pre-COVID combined-theme flags are now separated into AI prereview queues with explicit HI/domain review gates.
Classification changes now have measurable downstream effects
A cloned legacy 2,231-record branch shows how two taxonomy corrections propagate into typed routes and Knowledge Journey counts without touching the canonical corpus.
Representation Sensitivity is now measurable
The first bounded perturbation produced an experimental RSI of 13.8. The value is comparative and provisional, but the method lets us quantify how representation changes propagate into relationships and journeys.
Representation perturbation is now a reproducible protocol
The first CIDM calibration experiment has been generalized into a 10-step protocol with canonical-data protection, measurable outputs and explicit HI/domain review.
“Unknown” has been split into different scientific states
The 1,471 pathogen-unspecified/mixed records now test classifier gaps, mixed scope, non-applicable labels, insufficient evidence and genuine Reality unknowns.
iCIDM now asks why it does not know
Gaps no longer jump directly to “new scientific question.” They first pass through representation, multiplicity, scope and evidence checks before Reality Unknown promotion.
Candidate questions now face a promotion gate
The first conservative test held all current gap-generated candidates before U5 promotion: useful hypotheses remain visible, but none is automatically called a Reality Unknown.
Qualified questions now compete for scarce human attention
A transparent triage layer ranks what deserves a short audit next while explicitly separating workflow priority from scientific importance.
Before CIDM researches a question, ask whether the world already answered it
The first three high-attention candidate questions were globally checked and all three were substantially resolved. iCIDM now treats this as successful external learning and reformulation, not failure.
9 generated questions → 0 direct U5 promotions
All nine initial gap-generated questions have now been checked against global public evidence. 7 are substantially resolved globally and 2 need narrower reformulation; none should proceed in its original form as a new CIDM research project.
The legacy 2,231-record branch can become a knowledge-and-capability trajectory
The first pilot annotates six kinds of marginal knowledge gain without collapsing them into a simplistic impact score.
Candidate knowledge gain is now connected to later CIDM work
The 24-paper pilot now checks whether each candidate sits inside a continuing pathogen/technology/theme road, while keeping continuity distinct from causality.
One operating system beneath the colleague demo
Inspect why a relationship exists, its evidence state, review status, and Navigator promotion gate.
Colleagues can now teach iCIDM
Review a candidate relationship or question and record Confirm · Correct · Reject · Needs Evidence · Create Question · Create Experiment. Decisions are preserved first as review records; canonical promotion remains governed.
Promoted lessons can now guard future observations.
Rule Engine → Observation Guard → Universal Explorer. Advisory checks remain separate from source data and canonical graph mutation.
Two first stops
1 · Your paper. Find a paper you know in the Publication Explorer and open its Passport.
2 · iReview. Try the iReview route on a paper you know well.
After those two, explore anything else you wish. Support is not required. Criticism, correction, disagreement and suggestions are welcome.
Use it. Challenge it. Correct it. Tell us what you would change.
CIDM-PH Human Gate · Reality Return
Please use iCIDM honestly — support is not required. We welcome criticism, corrections, disagreement and suggestions as well as positive feedback.
Start with your papers and iReview, then tell us anything you notice anywhere in the Observatory: wrong, missing, unclear, overstated, difficult to use, useful, or worth building next.
Feedback → source check → evidence/status review → warranted correction → versioned update.
“Use it. Challenge it. Correct it. Tell us what you would change.”
Open the full Reality Return route →Open the complete iCIDM Resource Browser → — inspect individual files without decompressing the package.