# CIDM-PH Author / Colleague Reality Return

## Why your feedback matters

The first CIDM-PH Human Gate is deliberately open to **support, criticism, correction, disagreement and suggestions**.

You do **not** need to support iCIDM to contribute. If something is wrong, misleading, incomplete, difficult to find, not useful, or simply not convincing, please tell us.

> **Criticism is not the end of collaboration. Properly preserved and answered, criticism is how Human Intelligence and Artificial Intelligence learn together.**

## Two starting points

### 1. Find a paper you know
Use the Publication Explorer to find your paper, open its Publication Passport, and check:
- publication identity and authors;
- paper-specific CIDM/CIDM-PH affiliation representation;
- metadata and source links;
- research classification;
- connections to other iCIDM material.

### 2. Try iReview
Put a paper you know through iReview and inspect what it notices. Tell us what is:
- useful;
- missing;
- unclear;
- incorrect;
- overstated;
- or not useful.

## Then tell us anything else

You are also welcome to comment on **any part of iCIDM**, including:
- navigation and search;
- figures and tables;
- publication connections;
- HITS / Scientific Intelligence functions;
- Passport design;
- provenance;
- missing publications or information;
- the User Guide;
- anything confusing;
- anything unexpectedly useful;
- or what you think iCIDM should do next.

## Please be honest

A response such as:

> “I don't find this useful.”

is just as welcome as:

> “This is very useful.”

Both are observations that can help improve the system.

## Reality Return route

**Feedback → source check → evidence/status review → warranted correction → versioned update**

Feedback is an observation, not automatically a correction. Changes are made when the available source/evidence warrants them.

## What we especially want to learn

Can CIDM-PH scientists use iCIDM with their **real papers**, challenge its representation, and help us make the next version better?

There is no requirement to agree with the system.

**Use it. Challenge it. Correct it. Tell us what you would change.**