Representation Sensitivity Index
How strongly does a bounded change in representation propagate into the knowledge architecture built above it?
Layer-by-layer sensitivity
| Layer | Changed | Reference population | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Record exposure | 240 | 2231 | 10.79% |
| Classification edits | 244 | 2231 | 10.97% |
| Relationship turnover | 580 | 6427 | 9.02% |
| Journey sensitivity | 39 | 185 | 21.08% |
2.42
typed-route membership changes per changed record.
0.163
changed aggregate Journey signatures per changed record.
Formula v0.1
RSI = 100 × √(Relationship Turnover Rate × Journey Sensitivity Rate)
The geometric mean prevents either downstream layer from completely dominating the composite. Future versions can add Signature Journey and Capability-candidate sensitivity after those promotion rules are made reproducible.
Why this matters
The same experiment can be repeated across CIDM 2,231, Oxford Core 5000, Chinese 3500 and the reference population. RSI then becomes a common experimental language for asking how stable a knowledge architecture is to changes in its representations.