[
{
"question_passport_id": "ICIDM-UNASKED-001",
"status": "CANDIDATE_UNASKED",
"origin": "2231-publication corpus self-observation",
"gap_type": "RELATIONSHIP_SPARSE",
"question": "Why is the Cryptococcus × Whole-genome sequencing relationship sparse in the publication corpus, and is this a true capability gap, a terminology/classification gap, or simply an unrepresented relationship?",
"observational_basis": {
"gap_type": "RELATIONSHIP_SPARSE",
"pathogen": "Cryptococcus",
"technology": "Whole-genome sequencing",
"observed_publications": 0,
"pathogen_population": 100,
"technology_population": 185,
"score": 285.0,
"question": "Why is the Cryptococcus × Whole-genome sequencing relationship sparse in the publication corpus, and is this a true capability gap, a terminology/classification gap, or simply an unrepresented relationship?",
"reality_return": "Review source classifications and institutional history before deciding whether targeted evidence search or a new experiment is warranted.",
"boundary": "Publication sparsity does not imply scientific absence or institutional incapability."
},
"evidence_boundary": "Publication sparsity does not imply scientific absence or institutional incapability.",
"review_gate": "HI review required before research prioritisation",
"next_action": "Review source classifications and institutional history before deciding whether targeted evidence search or a new experiment is warranted."
},
{
"question_passport_id": "ICIDM-UNASKED-002",
"status": "CANDIDATE_UNASKED",
"origin": "2231-publication corpus self-observation",
"gap_type": "RELATIONSHIP_SPARSE",
"question": "Why is the Arboviruses × Clinical trial / therapy relationship sparse in the publication corpus, and is this a true capability gap, a terminology/classification gap, or simply an unrepresented relationship?",
"observational_basis": {
"gap_type": "RELATIONSHIP_SPARSE",
"pathogen": "Arboviruses",
"technology": "Clinical trial / therapy",
"observed_publications": 0,
"pathogen_population": 43,
"technology_population": 215,
"score": 258.0,
"question": "Why is the Arboviruses × Clinical trial / therapy relationship sparse in the publication corpus, and is this a true capability gap, a terminology/classification gap, or simply an unrepresented relationship?",
"reality_return": "Review source classifications and institutional history before deciding whether targeted evidence search or a new experiment is warranted.",
"boundary": "Publication sparsity does not imply scientific absence or institutional incapability."
},
"evidence_boundary": "Publication sparsity does not imply scientific absence or institutional incapability.",
"review_gate": "HI review required before research prioritisation",
"next_action": "Review source classifications and institutional history before deciding whether targeted evidence search or a new experiment is warranted."
},
{
"question_passport_id": "ICIDM-UNASKED-003",
"status": "CANDIDATE_UNASKED",
"origin": "2231-publication corpus self-observation",
"gap_type": "RELATIONSHIP_SPARSE",
"question": "Why is the Aspergillus × Whole-genome sequencing relationship sparse in the publication corpus, and is this a true capability gap, a terminology/classification gap, or simply an unrepresented relationship?",
"observational_basis": {
"gap_type": "RELATIONSHIP_SPARSE",
"pathogen": "Aspergillus",
"technology": "Whole-genome sequencing",
"observed_publications": 0,
"pathogen_population": 29,
"technology_population": 185,
"score": 214.0,
"question": "Why is the Aspergillus × Whole-genome sequencing relationship sparse in the publication corpus, and is this a true capability gap, a terminology/classification gap, or simply an unrepresented relationship?",
"reality_return": "Review source classifications and institutional history before deciding whether targeted evidence search or a new experiment is warranted.",
"boundary": "Publication sparsity does not imply scientific absence or institutional incapability."
},
"evidence_boundary": "Publication sparsity does not imply scientific absence or institutional incapability.",
"review_gate": "HI review required before research prioritisation",
"next_action": "Review source classifications and institutional history before deciding whether targeted evidence search or a new experiment is warranted."
},
{
"question_passport_id": "ICIDM-UNASKED-004",
"status": "CANDIDATE_UNASKED",
"origin": "2231-publication corpus self-observation",
"gap_type": "RELATIONSHIP_SPARSE",
"question": "Why is the Staphylococcus aureus / MRSA × Serology / immunology relationship sparse in the publication corpus, and is this a true capability gap, a terminology/classification gap, or simply an unrepresented relationship?",
"observational_basis": {
"gap_type": "RELATIONSHIP_SPARSE",
"pathogen": "Staphylococcus aureus / MRSA",
"technology": "Serology / immunology",
"observed_publications": 0,
"pathogen_population": 54,
"technology_population": 126,
"score": 180.0,
"question": "Why is the Staphylococcus aureus / MRSA × Serology / immunology relationship sparse in the publication corpus, and is this a true capability gap, a terminology/classification gap, or simply an unrepresented relationship?",
"reality_return": "Review source classifications and institutional history before deciding whether targeted evidence search or a new experiment is warranted.",
"boundary": "Publication sparsity does not imply scientific absence or institutional incapability."
},
"evidence_boundary": "Publication sparsity does not imply scientific absence or institutional incapability.",
"review_gate": "HI review required before research prioritisation",
"next_action": "Review source classifications and institutional history before deciding whether targeted evidence search or a new experiment is warranted."
},
{
"question_passport_id": "ICIDM-UNASKED-005",
"status": "CANDIDATE_UNASKED",
"origin": "2231-publication corpus self-observation",
"gap_type": "RELATIONSHIP_SPARSE",
"question": "Why is the Bordetella pertussis × Clinical trial / therapy relationship sparse in the publication corpus, and is this a true capability gap, a terminology/classification gap, or simply an unrepresented relationship?",
"observational_basis": {
"gap_type": "RELATIONSHIP_SPARSE",
"pathogen": "Bordetella pertussis",
"technology": "Clinical trial / therapy",
"observed_publications": 1,
"pathogen_population": 40,
"technology_population": 215,
"score": 127.5,
"question": "Why is the Bordetella pertussis × Clinical trial / therapy relationship sparse in the publication corpus, and is this a true capability gap, a terminology/classification gap, or simply an unrepresented relationship?",
"reality_return": "Review source classifications and institutional history before deciding whether targeted evidence search or a new experiment is warranted.",
"boundary": "Publication sparsity does not imply scientific absence or institutional incapability."
},
"evidence_boundary": "Publication sparsity does not imply scientific absence or institutional incapability.",
"review_gate": "HI review required before research prioritisation",
"next_action": "Review source classifications and institutional history before deciding whether targeted evidence search or a new experiment is warranted."
},
{
"question_passport_id": "ICIDM-UNASKED-006",
"status": "CANDIDATE_UNASKED",
"origin": "2231-publication corpus self-observation",
"gap_type": "RELATIONSHIP_SPARSE",
"question": "Why is the Influenza / respiratory viruses × Whole-genome sequencing relationship sparse in the publication corpus, and is this a true capability gap, a terminology/classification gap, or simply an unrepresented relationship?",
"observational_basis": {
"gap_type": "RELATIONSHIP_SPARSE",
"pathogen": "Influenza / respiratory viruses",
"technology": "Whole-genome sequencing",
"observed_publications": 2,
"pathogen_population": 133,
"technology_population": 185,
"score": 106.0,
"question": "Why is the Influenza / respiratory viruses × Whole-genome sequencing relationship sparse in the publication corpus, and is this a true capability gap, a terminology/classification gap, or simply an unrepresented relationship?",
"reality_return": "Review source classifications and institutional history before deciding whether targeted evidence search or a new experiment is warranted.",
"boundary": "Publication sparsity does not imply scientific absence or institutional incapability."
},
"evidence_boundary": "Publication sparsity does not imply scientific absence or institutional incapability.",
"review_gate": "HI review required before research prioritisation",
"next_action": "Review source classifications and institutional history before deciding whether targeted evidence search or a new experiment is warranted."
},
{
"question_passport_id": "ICIDM-UNASKED-007",
"status": "CANDIDATE_UNASKED",
"origin": "2231-publication corpus self-observation",
"gap_type": "RELATIONSHIP_SPARSE",
"question": "Why is the Streptococcus pneumoniae × Bioinformatics / modelling relationship sparse in the publication corpus, and is this a true capability gap, a terminology/classification gap, or simply an unrepresented relationship?",
"observational_basis": {
"gap_type": "RELATIONSHIP_SPARSE",
"pathogen": "Streptococcus pneumoniae",
"technology": "Bioinformatics / modelling",
"observed_publications": 0,
"pathogen_population": 48,
"technology_population": 41,
"score": 89.0,
"question": "Why is the Streptococcus pneumoniae × Bioinformatics / modelling relationship sparse in the publication corpus, and is this a true capability gap, a terminology/classification gap, or simply an unrepresented relationship?",
"reality_return": "Review source classifications and institutional history before deciding whether targeted evidence search or a new experiment is warranted.",
"boundary": "Publication sparsity does not imply scientific absence or institutional incapability."
},
"evidence_boundary": "Publication sparsity does not imply scientific absence or institutional incapability.",
"review_gate": "HI review required before research prioritisation",
"next_action": "Review source classifications and institutional history before deciding whether targeted evidence search or a new experiment is warranted."
},
{
"question_passport_id": "ICIDM-UNASKED-008",
"status": "CANDIDATE_UNASKED",
"origin": "2231-publication corpus self-observation",
"gap_type": "RELATIONSHIP_SPARSE",
"question": "Why is the Influenza / respiratory viruses × Bioinformatics / modelling relationship sparse in the publication corpus, and is this a true capability gap, a terminology/classification gap, or simply an unrepresented relationship?",
"observational_basis": {
"gap_type": "RELATIONSHIP_SPARSE",
"pathogen": "Influenza / respiratory viruses",
"technology": "Bioinformatics / modelling",
"observed_publications": 1,
"pathogen_population": 133,
"technology_population": 41,
"score": 87.0,
"question": "Why is the Influenza / respiratory viruses × Bioinformatics / modelling relationship sparse in the publication corpus, and is this a true capability gap, a terminology/classification gap, or simply an unrepresented relationship?",
"reality_return": "Review source classifications and institutional history before deciding whether targeted evidence search or a new experiment is warranted.",
"boundary": "Publication sparsity does not imply scientific absence or institutional incapability."
},
"evidence_boundary": "Publication sparsity does not imply scientific absence or institutional incapability.",
"review_gate": "HI review required before research prioritisation",
"next_action": "Review source classifications and institutional history before deciding whether targeted evidence search or a new experiment is warranted."
},
{
"question_passport_id": "ICIDM-UNASKED-009",
"status": "CANDIDATE_UNASKED",
"origin": "2231-publication corpus self-observation",
"gap_type": "STALE_OR_DORMANT",
"question": "The Streptococcus pneumoniae × PCR / molecular diagnostics relationship was recurrent but has not appeared recently in the corpus. Is the capability obsolete, absorbed into newer methods, dormant, or simply relabelled?",
"observational_basis": {
"gap_type": "STALE_OR_DORMANT",
"pathogen": "Streptococcus pneumoniae",
"technology": "PCR / molecular diagnostics",
"observed_publications": 8,
"last_seen": 2012,
"first_seen": 2003,
"score": 29.0,
"question": "The Streptococcus pneumoniae × PCR / molecular diagnostics relationship was recurrent but has not appeared recently in the corpus. Is the capability obsolete, absorbed into newer methods, dormant, or simply relabelled?",
"reality_return": "Trace later methods, teams, datasets and capability records before treating the relationship as lost.",
"boundary": "No recent publication signal does not prove loss of capability."
},
"evidence_boundary": "No recent publication signal does not prove loss of capability.",
"review_gate": "HI review required before research prioritisation",
"next_action": "Trace later methods, teams, datasets and capability records before treating the relationship as lost."
}
]