← iSydney iSee Home · Results & History →

iReview · PAPER + GRANT · LIVING SCIENTIFIC SECOND OBSERVER

Improve a paper or grant draft

iReview is not a score and not an automatic judge. It helps authors inspect the chain from question and design to claims, evidence, references, boundaries and conclusions. Human scientific judgement remains the decision gate; UNKNOWN/GREY are valid outcomes.

Core contract: Citation ≠ evidence. AI judgement ≠ Reality. A finding becomes useful when it points to a traceable passage, a reason to inspect it, and a next human/source-return action.

Quick entry points

Choose your review

iCIDM · Review your manuscript / paper draft →

iCIDM · Review your grant application draft →

C508 · Challenge / correction →

1 · Review target

Upload the manuscript or grant application draft you want iReview to examine. Current portable build: selecting a Word/PDF records the file; paste its text below for immediate scientific screening.

Paste here: click in the large white box and press Ctrl+V (Windows) or ⌘V (Mac). You can paste the whole draft or selected sections. Formatting is not required.

0 characters pasted.

2 · Scientific review focus

Default checks are mode-aware. Deep review adds source-return, reproducibility and cross-section consistency.

3 · Optional author observation

Ready — select a draft or enter review material, then run iReview.

4 · Human / Reality Return

Submission creates feedback for later human/source review. It does not automatically alter C508 or iCIDM.

Connected observatories

C508 / iC-See →

CIDM Research View · 1,947 →