← Resource Browser

icidm_lesson_passport_001.json

Type: .json · Size: 2,873 bytes

Open original resource →

{
  "lesson_passport_id": "ICIDM-LESSON-001",
  "status": "LIVE_DEMONSTRATION_PENDING_HI_REVIEW",
  "source_question_passport": "ICIDM-UNASKED-001",
  "source_reality_return_passport": "ICIDM-RR-001",
  "machine_observation": {
    "gap_type": "RELATIONSHIP_SPARSE",
    "pathogen": "Cryptococcus",
    "technology": "Whole-genome sequencing",
    "observed_publications": 0,
    "pathogen_population": 100,
    "technology_population": 185,
    "score": 285.0,
    "question": "Why is the Cryptococcus × Whole-genome sequencing relationship sparse in the publication corpus, and is this a true capability gap, a terminology/classification gap, or simply an unrepresented relationship?",
    "reality_return": "Review source classifications and institutional history before deciding whether targeted evidence search or a new experiment is warranted.",
    "boundary": "Publication sparsity does not imply scientific absence or institutional incapability."
  },
  "machine_judgement": "CANDIDATE_UNASKED",
  "question": "Why is the Cryptococcus × Whole-genome sequencing relationship sparse in the publication corpus, and is this a true capability gap, a terminology/classification gap, or simply an unrepresented relationship?",
  "evidence_boundary": "Publication sparsity does not imply scientific absence or institutional incapability.",
  "review_protocol": [
    "Inspect representative records that created the sparse/dormant signal.",
    "Check terminology, taxonomy and metadata consistency across time.",
    "Search institutional/public evidence for the relationship outside the current corpus labels.",
    "Ask a domain reviewer whether the relationship should scientifically be expected.",
    "Assign one adjudication outcome and record supporting evidence."
  ],
  "allowed_outcomes": [
    "TRUE_SCIENTIFIC_UNKNOWN",
    "CAPABILITY_GAP",
    "MEMORY_RETRIEVAL_GAP",
    "CLASSIFICATION_GAP",
    "APPROPRIATE_SPECIALISATION",
    "NO_GAP"
  ],
  "human_review": {
    "outcome": "PENDING_REVIEW",
    "reviewer_role": "",
    "evidence": "",
    "confidence": "",
    "notes": ""
  },
  "learning_rule": {
    "before": "Sparse publication relationship can generate a candidate gap.",
    "after_pending": "Do not change the detection rule until a real adjudication exists.",
    "future_update_template": "If outcome is MEMORY_RETRIEVAL_GAP or CLASSIFICATION_GAP, add retrieval/taxonomy checks before future gap promotion. If TRUE_SCIENTIFIC_UNKNOWN survives review, preserve the signal as a useful question-generation pattern."
  },
  "reality_return": {
    "required": true,
    "action": "Audit terminology/classification and retrieve representative papers before proposing new experiments.",
    "stop_rule": "Do not escalate to a new experiment if the apparent gap disappears after provenance/classification review.",
    "completed": false
  }
}