5-minute CIDM colleague test
No architecture lesson first. Try five things and tell us where reality disagrees with iCIDM.
1 Open a paper you know well.
Open Publication Explorer → Find your paper, open its Passport, and check whether the identity, authors, paper-specific CIDM/CIDM-PH context, metadata and classification make sense.
Open Publication Explorer → Find your paper, open its Passport, and check whether the identity, authors, paper-specific CIDM/CIDM-PH context, metadata and classification make sense.
2 Try iReview.
Open iReview → Try a paper you know well. Tell us what is useful, missing, unclear, incorrect, overstated or not useful.
Open iReview → Try a paper you know well. Tell us what is useful, missing, unclear, incorrect, overstated or not useful.
3 Follow one connection.
Open Navigator → Follow one publication/theme/pathogen/technology route and ask whether the connection makes sense.
Open Navigator → Follow one publication/theme/pathogen/technology route and ask whether the connection makes sense.
4 Challenge anything.
Find one thing anywhere in iCIDM that you would change: a missing paper, attribution, classification, relationship, source, figure/table link, wording or workflow.
Find one thing anywhere in iCIDM that you would change: a missing paper, attribution, classification, relationship, source, figure/table link, wording or workflow.
5 Return the judgement.
Open Reality Return → Support is not required. Criticism, correction, disagreement and suggestions are welcome. The goal is not to prove iCIDM right; it is to make the next version better.
Open Reality Return → Support is not required. Criticism, correction, disagreement and suggestions are welcome. The goal is not to prove iCIDM right; it is to make the next version better.